It seems as though great deals abound here in California since I was able to score two vintage bottles of Lehmann's Barossa Bordeaux blend "The Mentor" for a pretty fantastic price. Furthermore, Australian wines are not known so much for their ageability, and I was curious how a wine like this, from a major producer, would fair with moderate age on its back. Here are the results:
Showing cedar, chocolate, cassis, eucalyptus and blackberry on the densely layered nose, this promised a lot. The palate, however, was a bit disjointed and this is definitely not showing as well as it did last year. In fact, this has become alsmost too cashmere in texture, and it lacks the layering and elegance of the 99. Cassis and cedar predominate on the palate, which feels quite round in the mouth. So, while the wine has good flavour, it is lacking the punch I expected from its more youthful visage.
Clearly these wines can age, although I would suspect there is reasonable bottle and vintage variation in the quality of the aged wines. Also, I don't find them to be that much more expressive or complex than the most recent vintages; rather, the difference is in texture and elegance. I will enjoy continuing to sample some older Aussie wines to get a fuller sense of how they fare over time.
2 comments:
Shea,
Yet again, another well spotted bargain! Barossa Cabernet can be delicious, by favourite is the now defunct Seppelt Dorrien label, that the bean counters decided to mothball some years ago. One of the more optimistic wine critics (J. Oliver) gives the 2002 Mentor a drinking window up to 2022!
Interesting, I suspect the 2002 is going through a 'mute' period right now, then. It would be interesting to try it again in a few years. The 99 was showing really well.
I wonder if I can find that Seppelt on some vintage wine website.
Post a Comment